Actual Value Definitions – ASME Y14.5.1M-1994 Standard

In the last article we saw that tolerance zones are defined in the Y14.5M-1994 standard for Dimensioning and Tolerancing, but actual values are defined in the Y14.5.1M-1994 standard for Mathematical Definition of Dimensioning and Tolerancing Principles.  These actual values are of great interest in inspection, when we need to report numerical data for geometric characteristics.

The following are tolerance zone definitions for some of the simpler geometric characteristics, and their corresponding actual value definitions:

 GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTIC TOLERANCE ZONE DEFINITION (ASME Y14.5M-1994) ACTUAL VALUE DEFINITION (ASME Y14.5.1M-1994) Cylindricity Two coaxial cylinders separated by the specified Cylindricity tolerance Smallest Cylindricity tolerance to which the surface will conform Flatness Two parallel planes separated by the specified Flatness tolerance Smallest Flatness tolerance to which the surface will conform Angularity (planar surface) Two parallel planes separated by the Orientation tolerance, which are oriented to the datum(s) Smallest Perpendicularity tolerance to which the surface will conform Angularity (axis) Cylinder whose diameter is equal to the Perpendicularity tolerance, which is oriented to the datum(s) Smallest Perpendicularity tolerance to which the surface will conform Position RFS (Axis) Cylinder whose diameter is the Position tolerance, oriented and located to the datum(s) Smallest Position tolerance zone to which the axis will conform Total Runout (cylindrical surface) Two coaxial cylinders separated by the Total Runout tolerance, oriented and located to the datum axis Smallest Total Runout tolerance to which the surface will conform

Underlying Concept

The underlying concept for these actual value definitions is that the actual value is the smallest tolerance to which the feature will conform.  This can be thought of as expanding or contracting the tolerance zone until it just barely contains the controlled feature component, while respecting any constraints that the zone is subject to.

Optimization within Constraints

Finding the smallest tolerance to which the feature will conform brings in the concept of optimization within constraints.  Depending on the geometric characteristic, tolerance zones are subject to different constraints on their magnitude, orientation and location.  For more information in this, refer to the previous article “Determining the Constraints on a Tolerance zone”.  Any degree of freedom that is left unconstrained in the tolerance zone definition must be optimized when finding the actual value, in order to find the smallest tolerance to which the feature will conform.

The following table breaks down these degrees of freedom for the examples discussed above:

 ACTUAL VALUE DEFINITION (RESTATEMENT) ORIENTATION CONSTRAINT LOCATION CONSTRAINT MAGNITUDE CONSTRAINT Cylindricity Distance between closest two coaxial cylinders that the surface conforms to Unconstrained (must optimize) Unconstrained (must optimize) Unconstrained (must optimize) Flatness Distance between closest two parallel planes that the surface conforms to Unconstrained (must optimize) Unconstrained (must optimize) N/A Angularity (planar surface) Distance between closest two parallel planes that the surface conforms to, that are oriented to the datum(s) Constrained Unconstrained (must optimize) N/A Angularity (axis) Diameter of smallest cylinder that the axis conforms to, that is oriented to the datum(s) Constrained Unconstrained (must optimize) N/A Position RFS (Axis) Diameter of smallest cylinder that the axis conforms to, that is oriented and located to the datum(s) Constrained Constrained N/A Total Runout (cylindrical surface) Distance between closest two coaxial cylinders that the surface conforms to, that is oriented and located to the datum axis Constrained Constrained Unconstrained (must optimize)

Challenges for CMM Inspection

Optimization of the open degrees of freedom in the above simple examples is relatively straightforward, and most CMM software is able to handle it easily.  Other examples, however, can introduce more complex constraint situations.  These include:

·       Element-based characteristics (e.g. Circularity, Straightness, Circular Runout, Angularity with the EACH ELEMENT annotation)

·       Position tolerances on patterns of features

·       Composite Position (tolerance zones for lower segment are not located to the datums and must be optimized)

·       Mixed groups of features linked by the Rule of Simultaneous Requirements

The optimizations required to calculate the smallest tolerance to which the feature will conform can become extremely complex in the above examples, and most CMM software does not fully deal with them.  In some cases, the Y14.5.1M-1994 standard did not provide a definition for the actual values (e.g. Simultaneous Requirements).

Upcoming articles will examine some of these more complex cases.

### CMM Training

JSN Megazine template designed by JoomlaShine.com